[et_pb_section admin_label=”section”] [et_pb_row admin_label=”row”] [et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text”]

On the occasion of UNESCO’s conference on “Internet for Trust”, the Forum on Information and Democracy (I&D) published on February 21 a series of recommendations on the pluralism of curation and indexing algorithms, for the attention of States and digital platforms.

Ensuring pluralism in content curation is a priority for the Forum on Information and Democracy

This is a major issue identified by the Forum on Information and Democracy, the implementing body of the Partnership of the same name signed by 50 democratic States: tools used for curating and indexing information – meaning aggregating, sorting and prioritizing information – must provide alternative solutions, allowing for a pluralism of indexation, and allowing for freedom of choice for users.

To implement this principle, the Forum makes several recommendations to States and digital platforms, including:

The report also proposes several ways to give users the power over algorithms, in particular through a better control over their personal data used to profile and target them with specific content. For the authors of the report, several solutions should allow users to more easily get out of the filtering bubbles in which they are trapped:

These recommendations will be addressed to the 50 member states of the International Partnership for Information and Democracy, which meets at annual summits on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly to implement democratic principles in the digital space.

The risks of algorithmic bubbles for democracy and freedom

The attacks on democratic institutions such as the Capitol in Washington or Planalto in Brasilia are a major concern for the future. According to the members of the report, they are the result of a threatening groundswell for democracies: the polarization of public debate, if not the fragmentation of societies, linked to the functioning of digital platforms and social networks.

Moreover, the report highlights the business model of platforms, based on the attention economy, which encourages misinformation, conspiracy theory and the exacerbation of tensions between individuals, social groups and political camps. This radicalization of points of view and opinions tends to polarize democratic societies, to the detriment of a pluralist logic. 

ABOUT THE REPORT 

The steering committee of the working group was chaired by Professor Pier Luigi Parcu, Director of the Center for Media Freedom and Pluralism at the European University Institute in Florence, Italy. Researchers, journalists and technology experts such as William Bird of Media Monitoring Africa in South Africa, Brazilian journalist Patricia Campos Mello, known for her coverage of the disinformation of former president Jair Bolsonaro, and Angela Phillips, professor emeritus at the University of London, contributed their expertise to the team of rapporteurs led by Ayden Férdeline. The group mobilized dozens of experts in the field and received contributions from around the world. 

Steering Committee Members

ABOUT THE FORUM ON INFORMATION AND DEMOCRACY

The Forum on Information and Democracy is the implementing body of the International Partnership for Information and Democracy signed by 50 states around the world. The organization provides legislative recommendations to states and self-regulation to actors that structure the information and communication space (social networks, search engines, etc.).

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column] [/et_pb_row] [/et_pb_section]

One Response